Relevant visits
Help readers exploring your topic find the original page. Visits and conversions still need separate measurement.
Clear evidence. Practical next steps.
Fix JSON-LD syntax, then check the page facts
Understand the difference between parseable JSON-LD, truthful page information and eligibility for a search feature, using a practical example.
◎ For marketers⌘ For developers✧ For researchers
Audit in progress
Checking public access, discovery files and page content. This may take a moment.
Latest 100 reports · Stored in your account for one year.
Your focused check
The overall score below covers all eight audit checks, not just this tool.
Citable 2.0https://citable-2.onrender.comPAGE AUDIT · CHECKLIST POINTS
What we measured
Green: present · Amber: partial · Coral: improvement · Grey: unknown
Your next moves
Start with the largest measured gaps. Unknown checks need investigation, not assumed fixes.
DETAILED REPORT · ONE DOMAIN
Turn findings into a reviewable action plan.
Unlock the evidence behind all eight checks, training crawler permissions, priorities, and draft llms.txt and JSON-LD files. Review drafts before applying them.
One payment for this domain snapshot. No subscription. Saved to your account for one year from the audit. Download a copy to keep it longer.
Payments are not active.
CITABLE CERTIFICATE · SEPARATE PURCHASE
A verifiable record of a complete 100/100 page audit.
Includes the page address, scan and issue dates, checklist explanation, certificate number, and public verification link. Saved in your account and emailed as a link. Open the certificate to print or save a PDF using your browser.
Issued by Citable for this page and scan date. No external accreditation or guarantee of AI citations. Purchase within seven days of a complete audit. Refunded or disputed certificates show a revoked status.
Technical evidence
Observed page evidence is shown in its original language. Recommendations are in the separate action plan.
Training permissions (not scored)
Draft files
robots-review.txt is guidance, not a replacement robots.txt. Keep existing private-path rules. JSON-LD uses observed page facts and does not invent an Organization.
MY CERTIFICATES
Return to your certificates
Finding a script is only the beginning
PRACTICAL EXAMPLE · CHECKED 12 OCTOBER 2026
Structured data describes what a page represents in a format software can parse. A script's presence does not establish that it describes the right facts or qualifies for a search feature.
A teaching example: the trailing comma
This illustrative snippet is invalid JSON, not an observed problem on Citable or a customer website:
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"WebApplication","name":"Example tool",}Removing the final comma repairs its JSON syntax:
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"WebApplication","name":"Example tool"}That repair alone does not confirm that WebApplication fits the visible page, that its properties are accurate or that Google supports a rich result for it.
A real example from Citable
On 12 October 2026, Citable's homepage initial HTML contained WebApplication and WebSite JSON-LD. This shortened extract comes from the actual application markup:
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "WebApplication",
"name": "Citable 2.0",
"url": "https://citableaudit.com/",
"applicationCategory": "BusinessApplication",
"isAccessibleForFree": true
}The public application is free during the current beta. The extract describes that application without invented ratings, customer endorsements or professional credentials.
Check three different questions
- Can it be parsed? Inspect the initial HTML and fix genuine JSON syntax errors. Markup added only after JavaScript runs may not be observed by Citable.
- Is it accurate? Choose the schema type and facts that describe visible content. Do not copy a generic example onto an unrelated page.
- Does the search feature support it? Use the relevant specialist schema tools and Google's feature-specific requirements. Our basic check is not a complete schema validator.
Use the audit form to inspect observed markup and its evidence. A passing checklist does not guarantee ranking, rich results or AI citations.
Open the focused JSON-LD checker · Follow the inspection workflow · Tell us whether the next step was clear
Read the official Google documentation ↗
This tool runs Citable's full eight-check audit and highlights the relevant check. No signup required during public beta.
FROM DISCOVERY TO TRUST
Why AI search visibility matters
When an AI answer cites your work, readers can follow the source to your website. Clear, accessible content makes your expertise easier to understand and verify.
Verifiable expertise
Give researchers clear facts, authorship and sources they can check. Publish evidence worth referencing.
A shared action plan
Connect marketing priorities with concrete technical tasks your developer can review.
Educational links, not integrations or endorsements. Citable checks your page; it does not query these services, measure actual citations or guarantee inclusion.
LET’S TALK
Contact us
Have a question, a confusing result or a suggestion? Tell us which page you checked and what you noticed.
Please do not send passwords, access keys or private customer information.
WHAT THE SCORE MEASURES
Eight checks, with their limits visible.
AI search tool permissions 30 · Initial HTML text 15 · Metadata 15 · JSON-LD 15 · Sitemap 10 · Heading outline 5 · Canonical/social tags 5 · Optional llms.txt 5.
Unavailable resources remain unknown. An incomplete audit displays a possible score range. Short text does not prove JavaScript dependence. robots.txt is a permission signal; this scanner does not impersonate provider crawlers.
Your page summary
Checklist points, check states, scan date and measurement limits.
Evidence and next steps
Review the observed evidence, choose your next action and download a dated report. All report details and downloads are free during the public beta.